Re: CVS -> SVN -> Git

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/15/07, Eric S. Raymond <esr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Not quite.  I'm suggesting it's an appropriate lingua franca for centralized
VCSes with branching, e.g. everything pre-Arch.

That's a huge goal that gets in the way of waht we want to do here: we
are trying to save time, not embark on some huge mission.

cvs2svn has all the "wtf-did-cvs-mean-by-that" algorithms that are
very hard to write and maintain, and it seems to be the best one at
that. Of course, it also writes SVN repos -- but I'm sure that's the
easiest part.

    We don't need no meta VCS for any of this.

All we need is to hook into the "write out a repo based on all the
stuff we parsed from cvs". Perhaps it's doable, and if Michael helps
out abstracting that part a bit, maintainable long term too.

cheers,



m
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux