Hi, On Mon, 12 Aug 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > > > I think it might be worth just eliminating the whole idea. > > I kinda like the simplification ;-) An even thinner wrapper that > calls malloc() and dies if it gets NULL, without any "try-to-free" > logic. This is one of those instances where I wish we would have some reliable data rather than having to guess whether it is a good idea or not. Ciao, DScho
