Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > I think it might be worth just eliminating the whole idea. I kinda like the simplification ;-) An even thinner wrapper that calls malloc() and dies if it gets NULL, without any "try-to-free" logic.
Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > I think it might be worth just eliminating the whole idea. I kinda like the simplification ;-) An even thinner wrapper that calls malloc() and dies if it gets NULL, without any "try-to-free" logic.
|