On 2019-08-08 at 09:37:33, Jeff King wrote: > On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 11:56:14PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > -- >8 -- > Subject: [PATCH] t0000: reword comments for "local" test > > Commit 01d3a526ad (t0000: check whether the shell supports the "local" > keyword, 2017-10-26) added a test to gather data on whether people run > the test suite with shells that don't support "local". > > After almost two years, nobody has complained, and several other uses > have cropped up in test-lib-functions.sh. Let's declare it acceptable to > use. I'm also in favor of this patch. To my knowledge, the only FLOSS POSIX-compliant shell that doesn't support "local" is AT&T ksh, so there are a lot of alternatives that folks have (bash, dash, posh, zsh, mksh, pdksh, busybox sh, etc.) in case they have a less capable shell. -- brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
