Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Since we've haven't had any reports of users running into
> PCRE2_ERROR_JIT_STACKLIMIT in the wild I think we can safely assume
> that we can just use the library defaults instead and drop this
> code.
Does everybody use pcre2 with JIT with Git these days, or only those
who want to live near the bleeding edge?
> This won't change with the wider use of PCRE v2 in
> ed0479ce3d ("Merge branch 'ab/no-kwset' into next", 2019-07-15), a
> fixed string search is not a "large or complicated pattern".
In any case, if we were not "using" the custom stack anyway for v2,
this change does not hurt anybody, possibly other than those who
will learn about pcre2 support by reading this message and experiments
with larger patterns. And it should be simple to wire it back if it
becomes necessary later.
Thanks for cleaning up.
