Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Other than that, our options seem to be: > > 1. Live with it. IIRC we're already not sparse-clean, and Ramsay > mostly looks at the diff to find new problems. OK. > 2. Pass -Wno-non-pointer-null to sparse. Unfortunately that also > disables more useful warnings (like passing "0" instead of NULL to > a function). Non starter, I am afraind. The loss outweighs. > 3. Switch to NULL here, and adhere to that going forward. This does not sound too bad.
