Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Here's a re-roll of just the first patch of this series, since that was > the one that got all the comments (and the others are textually > independent). OK, will replace and then queue an adjustment for 6200 which used to use \$n but now must use %s instead. Let's see if people spot things worth pointing out in the remainder of the series (or this one, of course, but I found this step quite sensible). Thanks.
