Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] rebase: fix garbled progress display with '-x'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Wed, 12 Jun 2019, SZEDER Gábor wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 09:14:40PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 01:36:16PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > > > SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > > >
> > > > > -Rebasing (1/4)QRebasing (2/4)QRebasing (3/4)QRebasing (4/4)QSuccessfully rebased and updated refs/heads/missing-commit.
> > > > > +Rebasing (1/4)QRebasing (2/4)QRebasing (3/4)QRebasing (4/4)QQ                                                                                QSuccessfully rebased and updated refs/heads/missing-commit.
> > > > >  EOF
> > > >
> > > > Yuck,
> > >
> > > Oh yeah...
> > >
> > > >... but I do not see how else/better this test can be written
> > > > myself, which makes it a double-yuck X-<
> > >
> > > Perhaps hiding those spaces behind a helper variable e.g.
> > > 'dump_term_clear_line=Q<80-spaces>Q' and embedding that in the here
> > > docs specifying the expected output in these three tests could make it
> > > ever so slightly less yuck...
> > >
> > > > Are we forcing out test to operate under dumb terminal mode and with
> > > > a known number of columns?
> > >
> > > 'test-lib.sh' sets TERM=dumb relatively early on, and in these tests
> > > we don't use 'test_terminal' to run 'git rebase', so...  yeah.  And
> > > term_columns() defaults to 80.
> > >
> > > However, if the terminal were smart, then we would have to deal with
> > > ANSI escape suddenly popping up...
> >
> > And I fear that is *exactly* what makes
> > https://dev.azure.com/gitgitgadget/git/_build/results?buildId=10539&view=ms.vss-test-web.build-test-results-tab
> > fail...
>
> Isn't it a sign of a problem in that Windows test environment that
> it mistakenly believes that the terminal is smart, even though it has
> been explicitly set to dumb?

Yes, it looks like some odd decision there.

But the more important take-away from my mail is that we do not even want
those test cases to depend on the vagaries of the current progress
machinery.

Ciao,
Dscho

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux