Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] rebase: fix garbled progress display with '-x'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> -Rebasing (1/4)QRebasing (2/4)QRebasing (3/4)QRebasing (4/4)QSuccessfully rebased and updated refs/heads/missing-commit.
> +Rebasing (1/4)QRebasing (2/4)QRebasing (3/4)QRebasing (4/4)QQ                                                                                QSuccessfully rebased and updated refs/heads/missing-commit.
>  EOF

Yuck, ... but I do not see how else/better this test can be written
myself, which makes it a double-yuck X-<

Are we forcing out test to operate under dumb terminal mode and with
a known number of columns?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux