On Monday, June 3, 2019 10:14 AM, I wrote: > On Monday, June 3, 2019 9:50 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > To: Randall S. Becker <rsbecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: 'Junio C Hamano' <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>; git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] Git v2.22.0-rc2 > > > > Hi Randall, > > > > On Sun, 2 Jun 2019, Randall S. Becker wrote: > > > > > Just a few small nits from RC2 test results on the NonStop TNS/E > > > platform: > > > > > > 1. t0021 subtest 15 is being flakey. It fails on the first run (make > > > -k > > > test) but succeeds when run in isolation. This is new on the NonStop > > > TNS/E platform. t0021 has been a bit flakey in the past, but not > > > recently. Just thought I'd mention it. It's only slightly > > > disconcerting because I make very heavy use of smudge filters but > > > since it runs fine in isolation, I'm going to assume it is fine. We > > > had one unsubstantiated report of an occasional misfire of smudge > > > filters, but no substantive evidence at this point to reproduce the > situation. > > > > t0021.15 is indeed flaky, and not only for NonStop. It is so flaky, > > even, > that I > > opened https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/issues/241 > > Thanks. > > > > 2. t7519 subtest 25 still does not pass (previously reported for > > > RC1) when run via "make -k test" the first time. This runs > > > successfully when run in isolation or the second time. > > > > I offered a fix for that in js/fsmonitor-unflake, and it already made > > it > into > > `next` (and hopefully into v2.22.0) as you can see here: > > https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/commit/b5a81697520 (look for the > > branch symbol below the commit message). > > I'll keep an eye out for it. We are good with RC2 anyway. > > > > 3. t9001, t9020, t9600, t9601, t9602, t9604, fail, but should not > > > run on platform (not new, just a reminder). We do not have sendmail > > > or subversion. > > > > At least for Subversion, this should be detected. For send-email, I > > don't know... There *was* a bug in t9001 where it failed to mark a > > send-email tests cases with the `PERL` prerequisite, but that was > > fixed, and I guess > you > > have Perl anyway? > > Yes, we do have Perl on the box. However, the send-email functions do not > work - probably missing modules. As far as SVN goes, we have the git SVN > modules, but not the actual SVM modules in our Perl. There has been some > effort to port those, but we have had CPAN issues for a while now. I am > trying to find a resource to help with porting - personally, I could really use > the SVN module to allow svn2git to function on box. That would make my > life a whole lot easier. RC3 shows no new breaks on NonStop. We are good with approving this one. Kind Regards, Randall
