Hi Ævar, Thanks for the amazingly fast reply and for the useful feature (yay!). On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 05:37:10PM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 24 2019, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > > > Add the ability for the -G<regex> pickaxe to search only through added > > or removed lines in the diff, or even through an arbitrary amount of > > context lines when combined with -U<n>. > > > > This has been requested[1][2] a few times in the past, and isn't > > currently possible. Instead users need to do -G<regex> and then write > > their own post-parsing script to see if the <regex> matched added or > > removed lines, or both. There was no way to match the adjacent context > > lines other than running and grepping the equivalent of a "log -p -U<n>". > > > > 1. https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqwoqrr8y2.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > 2. https://public-inbox.org/git/20190424102609.GA19697@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > I see now once I actually read Eugeniu Rosca's E-Mail upthread instead > of just knee-jerk sending out patches that this doesn't actually solve > his particular problem fully. > > I.e. if you want some AND/OR matching support this --pickaxe-raw-diff > won't give you that, but it *does* make it much easier to script up such > an option. Run it twice with -G"\+<regex>" and -G"-<regex>", "sort | > uniq -c" the commit list, and see which things occur once or twice. > > Of course that doesn't give you more complex nested and/or cases, but if > git-log grew support for that like git-grep has the -G option could use > that, although at that point we'd probably want to spend effort on > making the underlying machinery smarter to avoid duplicate work. Purely from user's standpoint, I feel more comfortable with `git grep` and `git log --grep` particularly b/c they support '--all-match' [2], allowing more flexible multi-line searches. Based on your feedback, it looks to me that `git log -G/-S` did not have a chance to develop their features to the same level. > > Furthermore, and quoting Eugeniu upthread: > > In the context of [1], I would like to find all Linux commits which > replaced: > 'devm_request_threaded_irq(* IRQF_SHARED *)' > by: > 'devm_request_threaded_irq(* IRQF_ONESHOT *)' > > Such AND/OR machinery would give you what you wanted *most* of the time, > but it would also find removed/added pairs that were "unrelated" as well > as "related". Solving *that* problem is more complex, but something the > diff machinery could in principle expose. I expect some false positives, since git is agnostic on the language used to write the versioned files (the latter sounds like a research topic to me - I hope there is somebody willing to experiment with that in future). > > But the "-G<regex> --pickaxe-raw-diff" feature I have as-is is very > useful, I agree. I am a bit bothered by the fact that `git log --oneline -Ux -G<regex> --pickaxe-raw-diff` outputs the contents/patch of a commit. My expectation is that we have the `log -p` knob for that? > I've had at least two people off-list ask me about a problem > that would be solved by it just in the last 1/2 year (unrelated to them > having seen the WIP patch I sent last October). > > It's more general than Junio's suggested --pickaxe-ignore-{add,del} As a user, I would be happier to freely grep in the raw commit contents rather than learning a dozen of new options which provide small subsets of the same functionality. So, I personally vote for the approach taken by --pickaxe-raw-diff. This would also reduce the complexity of my current git aliases and/or allow dropping some of them altogether. Quite off topic, but I also needed to come up with a solution to get the C functions modified/touched by a git commit [3]. It is my understanding that --pickaxe-raw-diff can't help here and I still have to rely on parsing the output of `git log -p`? > options[1], but those could be implemented in terms of this underlying > code if anyone cared to have those as aliases. You'd just take the > -G<regex> and prefix the <regex> with "^\+" or "^-" as appropriate and > turn on the DIFF_PICKAXE_G_RAW_DIFF flag. > > 1. https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqwoqrr8y2.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ Thanks! [2] https://gitster.livejournal.com/30195.html [3] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50707171/how-to-get-all-c-functions-modified-by-a-git-commit -- Best regards, Eugeniu.