Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] gc: minor code cleanup + contention fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason  <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Changes since v2:
>
>  * The "let's detect that we don't need work in reflog expire" patch
>    is gone, as noted in a new set of tests/commit messages that was
>    tricker than expected, and not worth it.
>
>  * Minor rewording fixes to commit messages.
>
>  * Further paraphrased rationale in commit messages from replies to v2
>    feedback (thanks all!)
>
>  * The "no OID" and "no mustexist" case was confusingly conflated, now
>    we still do that in 8/8, but with a commit message & commit
>    explaining why and how that works.

All made sense (admittedly from a cursory look).  Will queue.

Thanks, all.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux