[WIP RFC PATCH 2/7] dir-iterator: use stat() instead of lstat()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is surely a horrible idea, but all tests pass with this (not that
I trust them much). Doing this for later WIP use in clone.c.

Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 dir-iterator.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/dir-iterator.c b/dir-iterator.c
index 070a656555..6a9c0c4d08 100644
--- a/dir-iterator.c
+++ b/dir-iterator.c
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ int dir_iterator_advance(struct dir_iterator *dir_iterator)
 				continue;
 
 			strbuf_addstr(&iter->base.path, de->d_name);
-			if (lstat(iter->base.path.buf, &iter->base.st) < 0) {
+			if (stat(iter->base.path.buf, &iter->base.st) < 0) {
 				if (errno != ENOENT) {
 					if (iter->pedantic)
 						goto error_out;
-- 
2.21.0.rc2.1.g2d5e20a900.dirty




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux