On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 9:45 PM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > .. > Can't the utility function we're moving to just be made to be > bug-compatible with what we're doing now with symlinks? I haven't really followed closely this thread. But I think the first step should be bug-compatible (it really depends if you count the current behavior "buggy"). Then add improvements on top if there's still time or strong consensus. It's easier to bisect that way at least. -- Duy
