Re: [PATCH] t5562: do not depend on /dev/zero

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Randall S. Becker" <rsbecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On February 15, 2019 13:01, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> To: Randall S. Becker <rsbecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: 'Max Kirillov' <max@xxxxxxxxxx>; git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 'Johannes
>> Schindelin' <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] t5562: do not depend on /dev/zero
>> 
>> "Randall S. Becker" <rsbecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>> > FTR, this particular subtest is not the one that is hanging. This
>> > subtest passes on NonStop with any and all (now) 4 solutions that have
>> > been floating around.
>> 
>> One thing I'd like to know more is if this test passes on NonStop with
> this
>> patch, i.e. /dev/zero replaced with /dev/null.
>
> Yes, this particular subtest passes replacing /dev/null. The other three
> subtests still hang. This subtest never did.

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux