Re: [PATCH] t5562: do not depend on /dev/zero

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] t5562: do not depend on /dev/zero
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 10:00:36 -0800
Cc: "'Max Kirillov'" <max@xxxxxxxxxx>, <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Johannes Schindelin'" <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <001601d4c551$d0f24c30$72d6e490$@nexbridge.com> (Randall S. Becker's message of "Fri, 15 Feb 2019 12:13:42 -0500")
References: <20190209185930.5256-4-randall.s.becker@rogers.com> <20190215164237.12250-1-max@max630.net> <001601d4c551$d0f24c30$72d6e490$@nexbridge.com>
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)

"Randall S. Becker" <rsbecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> FTR, this particular subtest is not the one that is hanging. This subtest
> passes on NonStop with any and all (now) 4 solutions that have been floating
> around.

One thing I'd like to know more is if this test passes on NonStop
with this patch, i.e. /dev/zero replaced with /dev/null.

Thanks.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [PATCH] t5562: do not depend on /dev/zero
  - From: Randall S. Becker

References:
- [Patch v1 3/3] t5562: replace /dev/zero with a pipe from generate_zero_bytes
  - From: randall . s . becker
- [PATCH] t5562: do not depend on /dev/zero
  - From: Max Kirillov
- RE: [PATCH] t5562: do not depend on /dev/zero
  - From: Randall S. Becker

Prev by Date: RE: [PATCH v2] read-cache: add post-indexchanged hook
Next by Date: RE: [PATCH] t5562: do not depend on /dev/zero
Previous by thread: RE: [PATCH] t5562: do not depend on /dev/zero
Next by thread: RE: [PATCH] t5562: do not depend on /dev/zero
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux