On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 9:39 AM Оля Тележная <olyatelezhnaya@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > пн, 11 февр. 2019 г. в 10:46, Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 6:48 AM Оля Тележная <olyatelezhnaya@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > - Unify ref-filter formats with other --pretty formats (which is new) > > > > > > I am ready to act as a mentor in this task, I know that part of > > > project good enough. > > > > Great! I thought that it would be a good project for you to mentor and > > that's why I added it. > > > > By the way if you would prefer not to mentor the other project I can > > remove you from its possible mentor list. > > I am ready to try mentoring on both projects, but it would be much > easier for me to work only for this one. I removed my name from the > other one and made pull request: > https://github.com/git/git.github.io/pull/355 Great, merged! > If project about pretty will not be selected by any of the students, I > am happy to help other mentors with other projects. Ok, we will see. > > Do you mean the following comment from > > https://github.com/git/git/blob/c17ed82b8983ea7e172181d869966db546c6a528/ref-filter.c#L2393-L2399: > > > > /* > > * TODO: add support of %(*raw). Need to switch between oi and oi_deref for that. > > * TODO: split logic and printing (as it is done in format_ref_array_item and > > * show_ref_array_item). After that we could use %(raw) in all > > ref-filter commands. > > * TODO: rewrite print_object_or_die so that it will reuse result of general > > * oid_object_info_extended call. > > */ > > > > ? > > > > It doesn't look like that's it. Could you just copy the task into an > > email? Or if you think it could be an idea for a GSoC project, could > > you send a pull request to add it to: > > > > https://github.com/git/git.github.io/blob/master/SoC-2019-Ideas.md > > > > ? > > Yes, that's it. Particularly, the last TODO. But other TODOs will be > also solved as a result. I can add it to the list of the projects if > you find this task suitable. I think it is ok if we propose that task first and then the "Unify ref-filter formats with other --pretty formats" project in case the student finishes the first task soon. Or do you see other tasks for a student after this? Anyway I don't think we should have both one student working on the "Unify ref-filter formats with other --pretty formats" project and another one on this task. But yeah, if you want, feel free to send a pull request to add it with the above caveats. > > They also want "more detailed description of [each] project (2-5 > > sentences)", so I think we should work on that too. > > I added description for one of projects, it is also in my pull request. Thanks, Christian.
