Re: [PATCH 4/4] built-in rebase: call `git am` directly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Junio,

On Fri, 18 Jan 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
> 
> >> Overall, this was quite a pleasant read and a well constructed
> >> series.  Other than two minor points (i.e. interaction with the
> >> 'post-checkout hook' topic, and discard_cache() before calling
> >> move_to_original_branch) I did not quite understand, looks good to
> >> me.
> >> 
> >> When merged to 'pu', I seem to be getting failure from t3425.5, .8
> >> and .11, by the way.  I haven't dug into the actual breakages any
> >> further than that.
> >
> > Sorry for the trouble, and for my silence (I was heads-down into the Azure
> > Pipelines support).
> >
> > I did not see any breakage in `pu` lately, hopefully things resolved
> > themselves?
> 
> The (semantic) conflict resolution can be seen in
> 
>     $ git show 'origin/pu^{/^Merge branch .js/rebase-am. into}'
> 
> which is recorded in my rerere database ;-)

That looks all good to me, with the minor nit that you did not wrap at
<= 80 columns/row:

 -                       "--no-cover-letter", "--pretty=mboxrd", NULL);
++                       "--no-cover-letter", "--pretty=mboxrd", "--topo-order", NULL);

I am not a stickler to this line length rule, though, as I long switched
away from the 80x25 screen and can easily resize my text windows.

Ciao,
Dscho



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux