Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
>> Overall, this was quite a pleasant read and a well constructed
>> series. Other than two minor points (i.e. interaction with the
>> 'post-checkout hook' topic, and discard_cache() before calling
>> move_to_original_branch) I did not quite understand, looks good to
>> me.
>>
>> When merged to 'pu', I seem to be getting failure from t3425.5, .8
>> and .11, by the way. I haven't dug into the actual breakages any
>> further than that.
>
> Sorry for the trouble, and for my silence (I was heads-down into the Azure
> Pipelines support).
>
> I did not see any breakage in `pu` lately, hopefully things resolved
> themselves?
The (semantic) conflict resolution can be seen in
$ git show 'origin/pu^{/^Merge branch .js/rebase-am. into}'
which is recorded in my rerere database ;-)
