Re: BUG: CR marker ^M doesn't show up in '-' lines of diffs when the ending of the removed line is CR+LF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Frank Schäfer <fschaefer.oss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hi Junio,
>
> Am 29.11.18 um 03:11 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> [...]
>> This was misspoken a bit.  Let's revise it to
>>
>>  	When producing a colored output (not limited to whitespace
>>  	error coloring of diff output) for contents that are not
>>  	marked as eol=crlf (and other historical means), insert
>>  	<RESET> before a CR that comes immediately before a LF.
> You mean
>      ...
>      <RESET> *after* a CR that comes immediately before a LF."
>
> OK, AFAICS this produces the desired output in all cases if eol=lf.

OK, yeah, I think I meant "after", i.e. ... CR <RESET> LF, in order
to force CR to be separated from LF.

> Now what about the case eol=crlf ?

I have no strong opinions, other than that "LF in repository, CRLF
in working tree" would make the issue go away (when it is solved for
EOL=LF like the above, that is).

> Keeping the current behavior of '-' lines is correct.
> But shouldn't ^M now be suppressed in '+' lines for a consistent behavior ?

If "LF in repository, CRLF in working tree" is done, there would not
be ^M at the end of the line, not just for removed lines, but also
for added lines, no?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux