Re: BUG: CR marker ^M doesn't show up in '-' lines of diffs when the ending of the removed line is CR+LF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Junio,

Am 29.11.18 um 03:11 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
[...]
> This was misspoken a bit.  Let's revise it to
>
>  	When producing a colored output (not limited to whitespace
>  	error coloring of diff output) for contents that are not
>  	marked as eol=crlf (and other historical means), insert
>  	<RESET> before a CR that comes immediately before a LF.
You mean
     ...
     <RESET> *after* a CR that comes immediately before a LF."


OK, AFAICS this produces the desired output in all cases if eol=lf.

Now what about the case eol=crlf ?
Keeping the current behavior of '-' lines is correct.
But shouldn't ^M now be suppressed in '+' lines for a consistent behavior ?

With other words:
"If CR comes immediately before a LF, do the following with *all* lines:
<RESET> after the CR if eol=lf but do not <RESET> after the CR if eol=crlf."

Regards,
Frank



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux