Hi, On Sun, 1 Jul 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > > >> +(no subcommand):: > >> + > >> + Save your local modifications to a new 'stash', and run `git-reset > >> + --hard` to revert them. > > > > For orthogonality's sake, should this be 'git-stash save', aliased to > > just 'git-stash'? It would make this heading a little more intuitive, > > and the very first paragraph (describing all of the modes) a little more > > clear. > > I would further suggest that we _require_ 'git stash save' to > create a new one and perhaps make the non-subcommand case run > 'git stash list'. While I was trying the code out I > accidentally created a new stash when I did not mean to, which > pushed the stash I wanted to apply down in the list every time I > made such a mistake. Well, the normal thing you want to do if you say "git stash" is best described by "Git, stash!". However, unstash would by a nice feature. Not easy, but nice. Not easy, because we would be actively outsmarting the reflog machinery we use for the stash. Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
