Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: >> +(no subcommand):: >> + >> + Save your local modifications to a new 'stash', and run `git-reset >> + --hard` to revert them. > > For orthogonality's sake, should this be 'git-stash save', aliased to > just 'git-stash'? It would make this heading a little more intuitive, > and the very first paragraph (describing all of the modes) a little more > clear. I would further suggest that we _require_ 'git stash save' to create a new one and perhaps make the non-subcommand case run 'git stash list'. While I was trying the code out I accidentally created a new stash when I did not mean to, which pushed the stash I wanted to apply down in the list every time I made such a mistake. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
