On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 07:52:30AM +0100, Christian Couder wrote: > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 8:20 PM Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 8:07 PM SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > With the default 20% threshold a new shared index is written rather > > > frequently with our usual small test-repos: > > > > Side note. Split index is definitely not meant for small repos. > > I very much agree with that. It makes sense to use them only for big > repos and big repos usually don't pass a 20% threshold very often. But our test suite does use very small repositories, so perhaps we have been already testing what Ævar wanted to test? (Though I didn't quite understood what that was; and we likely don't do so explicitly, but only by chance with GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX=1.) > > But > > maybe we should have a lower limit (in terms of absolute number of > > entries) that prevent splitting. This splitting seems excessive. > > I would agree if split index was the default mode or if our goal was > to eventually make it the default mode. Same here. If you don't need split index, i.e. don't have huge repos, then don't enable it in the first place. And if it is enabled in a small repo, then the extra effort to write a new shared index is negligible, and the space wasted for those small files doesn't really matter (though arguably the output from a 'ls .git' would be surprising... which, at the same time, would be a good motivating factor to turn the feature off).
