On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 06:41:43PM +0100, Christian Couder wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 6:34 PM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason > <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'm asking whether the bug in this patch isn't revealing an existing > > issue with us not having any tests for N number of sharedindex.* > > files. I.e. we have >1 of them, merge them and prune them, don't we? We don't merge shared index files, but write a new one. > I think we shouldn't have many of them. Usually we should have just > one, though it's possible that switching the shared index files > feature on and off several times or using temporary index files could > create more than one. > > And there is clean_shared_index_files() which calls > should_delete_shared_index() to make sure they are regularly cleaned > up. I would think that it's more common to have more than one shared index files, because a new shared index is written when the number of entries in the split index reaches the threshold given in 'splitIndex.maxPercentChange'. The old ones are kept until they expire, and 'splitIndex.sharedIndexExpire' defaults to 2 weeks (and can even be be set to "never"). With the default 20% threshold a new shared index is written rather frequently with our usual small test-repos: $ git init $ git update-index --split-index $ ls -1 .git/*index* .git/index .git/sharedindex.4370042739b31cd17a5c5cd6043a77c9a00df113 $ echo 1 >file $ git add file $ git commit -q -m 1 $ echo 2 >file $ git commit -q -m 2 file $ echo 3 >file $ git commit -q -m 3 file $ ls -1 .git/*index* .git/index .git/sharedindex.4370042739b31cd17a5c5cd6043a77c9a00df113 .git/sharedindex.6aedbf71b1a6bdc0018078ec7571e1b21ba4b954 .git/sharedindex.b9106e9b82a818a0e4e9148224fc44ea98f488a1 .git/sharedindex.bad0b75d270a431b9e961cfc15df6ec935a67be8 > Anyway it's a different topic and according to what we privately > discussed I just sent > https://public-inbox.org/git/20181116173105.21784-1-chriscool@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > to fix the current issue.
