Re: [PATCH 1/1] poll: use GetTickCount64() to avoid wrap-around issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] poll: use GetTickCount64() to avoid wrap-around issues
From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2018 22:33:13 -0500
Cc: Johannes Sixt <j6t@xxxxxxxx>, carenas@xxxxxxxxx, shoelzer@xxxxxxxxx, gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx, Git List <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <xmqqefc0mnlh.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
References: <pull.64.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> <69bc5924f94b56f92d9653b3a64f721bd03f1956.1541020294.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> <c9e001de-3598-182d-416e-1e94f234c249@kdbg.org> <CACbrTHctZejfDTjqWqVfPYdb=ssD253Cd2isr3BxWsL1AqsH2w@mail.gmail.com> <e8b7b173-eaa1-0fad-7e6a-771389872886@kdbg.org> <CAPUEspgF0GjJPtMqmZjUmsEeaJpQQBBwOV9YOg8A6YBdwbdaFA@mail.gmail.com> <46aa1893-095b-9f0c-4989-e63ebaa88705@kdbg.org> <xmqqefc0mnlh.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>

On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 6:26 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> OK, thanks.  It seems that the relative silence after this message
> is a sign that the resulting patch after squashing is what everybody
> is happey with?
>
> -- >8 --
> From: Steve Hoelzer <shoelzer@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@xxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Steve Hoelzer <shoelzer@xxxxxxxxx>

It's not clear from this who the author is.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] poll: use GetTickCount64() to avoid wrap-around issues
  - From: Junio C Hamano

References:
- [PATCH 0/1] Make compat/poll safer on Windows
  - From: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
- [PATCH 1/1] poll: use GetTickCount64() to avoid wrap-around issues
  - From: Steve Hoelzer via GitGitGadget
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] poll: use GetTickCount64() to avoid wrap-around issues
  - From: Johannes Sixt
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] poll: use GetTickCount64() to avoid wrap-around issues
  - From: Steve Hoelzer
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] poll: use GetTickCount64() to avoid wrap-around issues
  - From: Johannes Sixt
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] poll: use GetTickCount64() to avoid wrap-around issues
  - From: Carlo Arenas
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] poll: use GetTickCount64() to avoid wrap-around issues
  - From: Johannes Sixt
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] poll: use GetTickCount64() to avoid wrap-around issues
  - From: Junio C Hamano

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] Base SHA-256 implementation
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] pretty: allow showing specific trailers
Previous by thread: RE: [PATCH 1/1] poll: use GetTickCount64() to avoid wrap-around issues
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] poll: use GetTickCount64() to avoid wrap-around issues
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]