On Thu, Nov 01 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote: > * ab/push-dwim-dst (2018-10-29) 9 commits > - SQUASH??? > - push doc: document the DWYM behavior pushing to unqualified <dst> > - push: add DWYM support for "git push refs/remotes/...:<dst>" > - push: test that <src> doesn't DWYM if <dst> is unqualified > - push: add an advice on unqualified <dst> push > - push: move unqualified refname error into a function > - push: improve the error shown on unqualified <dst> push > - i18n: remote.c: mark error(...) messages for translation > - remote.c: add braces in anticipation of a follow-up change > > "git push $there $src:$dst" rejects when $dst is not a fully > qualified refname and not clear what the end user meant. The > codepath has been taught to give a clearer error message, and also > guess where the push should go by taking the type of the pushed > object into account (e.g. a tag object would want to go under > refs/tags/). > > The last few steps are questionable. > cf. <87in1lkw54.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Will send an update to this soon. > * ab/pack-tests-cleanup (2018-10-31) 3 commits > - index-pack tests: don't leave test repo dirty at end > - pack-objects tests: don't leave test .git corrupt at end > - pack-objects test: modernize style > > A couple of tests used to leave the repository in a state that is > deliberately corrupt, which have been corrected. > > Will merge to 'next'. Thanks! > * ab/reject-alias-loop (2018-10-19) 1 commit > (merged to 'next' on 2018-10-26 at bc213f1bef) > + alias: detect loops in mixed execution mode > > Two (or more) aliases that mutually refer to each other can form an > infinite loop; we now attempt to notice and stop. > > Discarded. > Reverted out of 'next'. > cf. <87sh0slvxm.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> *nod* will try to find time to work on this soon, but treating it as non-urgent. Could you please pick up https://public-inbox.org/git/20181024114725.3927-1-avarab@xxxxxxxxx/ ? It seems to have fallen between the cracks and addressed the feedback on v1, and looks good to me (and nobody's objected so far...).