Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: >> Either is fine. I am not moving 'next' beyond what is necessary for >> this release cycle during the pre-release freeze period, and because >> I thought that Peff was in favor of squashing in the changes to the >> original when the next cycle starts, I haven't bothered to merge the >> fix there yet. > > I think Ævar's point is just that the current tip of next is badly > broken if you use bitmaps, and it's worth hot-fixing that in the > meantime. I know that ;-) My point is that anybody who *needs* handholding from the upstream project (i.e. not Ævar, but those whom he is trying to help with the suggestion) should not be looking at 'next' during the prerelease freeze. They should be looking at 'master' instead, and that is why I am not spending more than minimum cycles of my own worrying about 'next' during the prerelease. In any case, I think the final is ready to go, almost. I still need to do the preformatted docs, though.
