Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> But please remind me not to merge this round down to 'next', for the >> "enum" forward decl gotcha. > > I'll send out a new round shortly. Would you like me to squash the > last patch (the one that had two hunks with minor conflicts with other > topics in next and pu) into the first patch, or would you rather I > dropped that patch and waited to submit it until later? Either way is fine, especially if you looked at the intergration result from yesterday and resolution of these conflicts looked reasonable to you.
