On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 10:45 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 11:24 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > > > >> As things are slowly moving out of the so-far kitchen-sink "cache.h" > >> into more specific subsystem headers (like object-store.h), we may > >> actually want to tighten the "header that includes it first" part a > >> bit in the future, so that 'git grep cache.h' would give us a more > >> explicit and a better picture of what really depends on knowing what > >> the lowest level plumbing API are built around. > >> > >> > So I think the better test is a two-line .c file with: > >> > > >> > #include "git-compat-util.h" > >> > #include $header_to_check > >> > >> But until that tightening happens, I do not actually mind the > >> two-line .c file started with inclusion of cache.h instead of > >> git-compat-util.h. That would limit the scope of this series > >> further. > > > > Yes, this removes about 2/3 of patch #1. > > Sorry for making a misleading comment. I should have phrased "I > would not have minded if the series were looser by assuming > cache.h", implying that "but now the actual patch went extra mile to > be more complete, what we have is even better ;-)". Ah, gotcha. Thanks for the clarification.
