Re: [PATCH 00/24] Kill the_index part3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Brandon Williams <bmwill@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 08/13, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
>> This is the third part of killing the_index (at least outside
>> builtin/). Part 1 [1] is dropped. Part 2 is nd/no-extern on 'pu'. This
>> part is built on top of nd/no-extern.
>> 
>> This series would actually break 'pu' because builtin/stash.c uses
>> three functions that are updated here. So we would need something like
>> the following patch to make it build again.
>> 
>> I don't know if that adds too much work on Junio. If it does, I guess
>> I'll hold this off for a while until builtin/stash.c gets merged
>> because reordering these patches, pushing the patches that break
>> stash.c away, really takes a lot of work.
>> 
>> [1] https://public-inbox.org/git/20180616054157.32433-1-pclouds@xxxxxxxxx/
>
> I went through and found this to be a pleasant read and hopefully others
> agree with the approach this series took vs what your part 1 did so that
> we can get this change in.

Yeah, I've only finished my first pass (read: I didn't go through
the patches with fine toothed comb, nor thought about interactions
with other topics), but this round was quite a pleasnt read so far.






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux