Re: [PATCH 00/24] Kill the_index part3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/13, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> This is the third part of killing the_index (at least outside
> builtin/). Part 1 [1] is dropped. Part 2 is nd/no-extern on 'pu'. This
> part is built on top of nd/no-extern.
> 
> This series would actually break 'pu' because builtin/stash.c uses
> three functions that are updated here. So we would need something like
> the following patch to make it build again.
> 
> I don't know if that adds too much work on Junio. If it does, I guess
> I'll hold this off for a while until builtin/stash.c gets merged
> because reordering these patches, pushing the patches that break
> stash.c away, really takes a lot of work.
> 
> [1] https://public-inbox.org/git/20180616054157.32433-1-pclouds@xxxxxxxxx/

I went through and found this to be a pleasant read and hopefully others
agree with the approach this series took vs what your part 1 did so that
we can get this change in.


-- 
Brandon Williams



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux