Re: [PATCH/RFH] pp_header(): work around possible memory corruption

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> At least the older humongous pretty_print_commit() got separated into 
> manageable chunks, and I was happy.  I was just too lazy when 
> refactoring the code and stopped there.

That's perfectly okay. This is why you parked it in 'next', I guess.

> The right fix is to propagate the "realloc as needed" callchain into 
> add_user_info(), instead of having "this should be enough" there.  
> These two you touched are the only two callsite of that static function.

Right. As I said, I was in a hurry, and could not research it properly. 
Besides, now that you gave me the proper pointer, I can take care about it 
tomorrow, unless somebody else is faster.

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux