Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > "brian m. carlson" <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 11:40:08AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >>> "brian m. carlson" <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> >>> > On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 04:02:36PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >>> >> -------------------------------------------------- >>> >> [New Topics] >>> > >>> > I had expected to see >>> > <20180729192803.1047050-1-sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (the refspec @ >>> > handling) in this list, but I don't. Were you expecting changes or >>> > additional feedback before picking it up? >>> >>> Neither. I just am not all that interested in seeing @ used for >>> HEAD in the first place, as I find it quite confusing. >> >> Okay. Is that just in this case, or in general? If nobody but me wants >> this feature, I'm fine dropping it. > > That's the typical case of me saying something in a deliberatly > outrageous way so that we can hopefully see people from both sides. I guess that makes the answer to the original question "the latter" ;-)
