"brian m. carlson" <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 11:40:08AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> "brian m. carlson" <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 04:02:36PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >> -------------------------------------------------- >> >> [New Topics] >> > >> > I had expected to see >> > <20180729192803.1047050-1-sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (the refspec @ >> > handling) in this list, but I don't. Were you expecting changes or >> > additional feedback before picking it up? >> >> Neither. I just am not all that interested in seeing @ used for >> HEAD in the first place, as I find it quite confusing. > > Okay. Is that just in this case, or in general? If nobody but me wants > this feature, I'm fine dropping it. That's the typical case of me saying something in a deliberatly outrageous way so that we can hopefully see people from both sides.
