Re: Re* [PATCH] push: comment on a funny unbalanced option help

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



René Scharfe <l.s.r@xxxxxx> writes:

> Am 02.08.2018 um 22:36 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>>> Thanks, FWIW that's fine by me, and also if you want to drop this "fake"
>>> patch of mine and replace it with something René came up with (I have
>>> not yet read his 1-6 patches submitted on this topic, so maybe they're
>>> not mutually exclusive).
>> 
>> I think the 6-patch series supersedes this one.  Thanks anyway.
>
> Actually no, I specifically avoided touching builtin/push.c because this
> patch already handled it; it should still be applied before patch 6 from
> my series.

You're of course correct.  Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux