Re: [PATCH] push: comment on a funny unbalanced option help

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> +		  /* N_() will get "<>" around, resulting in "<refname>:<expect>" */
>
> ...but this comment isn't accurate at all, N_() doesn't wrap the string
> with <>'s, as can be seen by applying this patch:

I know.  It is a short-hand for "what's inside N_() we see here".
Try to come up with an equivalent that fits on a 80-char line.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux