Am 31.07.2018 um 23:06 schrieb Junio C Hamano: > Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > >> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 01:23:04PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: >> ... >> So here it is fixed, and with a commit message. I'm not happy to omit a >> regression test, but I actually couldn't come up with a minimal one that >> tickled the problem, because we're playing around with heuristics. How about something like this? (squashable) --- t/t6029-merge-subtree.sh | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) diff --git a/t/t6029-merge-subtree.sh b/t/t6029-merge-subtree.sh index 3e692454a7..474a850de6 100755 --- a/t/t6029-merge-subtree.sh +++ b/t/t6029-merge-subtree.sh @@ -29,6 +29,34 @@ test_expect_success 'subtree available and works like recursive' ' ' +test_expect_success 'setup branch sub' ' + git checkout --orphan sub && + git rm -rf . && + test_commit foo +' + +test_expect_success 'setup branch main' ' + git checkout -b main master && + git merge -s ours --no-commit --allow-unrelated-histories sub && + git read-tree --prefix=dir/ -u sub && + git commit -m "initial merge of sub into main" && + test_path_is_file dir/foo.t && + test_path_is_file hello +' + +test_expect_success 'update branch sub' ' + git checkout sub && + test_commit bar +' + +test_expect_success 'update branch main' ' + git checkout main && + git merge -s subtree sub -m "second merge of sub into main" && + test_path_is_file dir/bar.t && + test_path_is_file dir/foo.t && + test_path_is_file hello +' + test_expect_success 'setup' ' mkdir git-gui && cd git-gui && -- 2.18.0
