Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: >> While addressing 1 make 2 obvious and worse, addressing 2 is a whole >> different story and should probably be discussed outside of this >> thread. And i would not like to inherit responsibility for 2. In >> fact the whole discussion emphasizes that it was a good idea to make >> GPGSM depend on GPG, because it allows to somewhat reuse existing tests. > > IMHO there is a big difference between inheriting responsibility for > something, and not making it worse. Well said.
