On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:52:31AM +0200, Henning Schild wrote:
> diff --git a/t/lib-gpg.sh b/t/lib-gpg.sh
> index a5d3b2cba..9dcb4e990 100755
> --- a/t/lib-gpg.sh
> +++ b/t/lib-gpg.sh
> @@ -38,7 +38,14 @@ then
> "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/lib-gpg/ownertrust &&
> gpg --homedir "${GNUPGHOME}" </dev/null >/dev/null 2>&1 \
> --sign -u committer@xxxxxxxxxxx &&
> - test_set_prereq GPG
> + test_set_prereq GPG &&
> + echo | gpgsm --homedir "${GNUPGHOME}" -o "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/lib-gpg/gpgsm.crt.user --passphrase-fd 0 --pinentry-mode loopback --generate-key --batch "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/lib-gpg/gpgsm-gen-key.in &&
Is this --generate-key going to require high-quality entropy? That could
slow the test suite down (and maybe even stall it quite a bit on servers
doing automated CI).
Can we save a dummy generated key and just import it? That's what we do
for the regular gpg case.
> + gpgsm --homedir "${GNUPGHOME}" --import "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/lib-gpg/gpgsm.crt.user &&
> + gpgsm --homedir "${GNUPGHOME}" -K | grep fingerprint: | cut -d" " -f4 | tr -d '\n' > ${GNUPGHOME}/trustlist.txt &&
> + echo " S relax" >> ${GNUPGHOME}/trustlist.txt &&
> + (gpgconf --kill gpg-agent >/dev/null 2>&1 || : ) &&
> + echo hello | gpgsm --homedir "${GNUPGHOME}" -u committer@xxxxxxxxxxx -o /dev/null --sign - 2>&1 &&
> + test_set_prereq GPGSM
This &&-chain means we can't have GPGSM without GPG. In theory the two
could be tested independently. I don't know if it's worth the trouble to
make that work, though. I wouldn't be surprised if there are some subtle
dependencies within the test scripts, and I'm not sure how common it is
for somebody to have gpgsm and not gpg. So it may make sense to just
punt on it until such a person appears.
> test_expect_success GPG 'log --graph --show-signature' '
> git log --graph --show-signature -n1 signed >actual &&
> grep "^| gpg: Signature made" actual &&
> grep "^| gpg: Good signature" actual
> '
>
> +test_expect_success GPGSM 'log --graph --show-signature x509' '
> + git log --graph --show-signature -n1 signed-x509 >actual &&
> + grep "^| gpgsm: Signature made" actual &&
> + grep "^| gpgsm: Good signature" actual
> +'
We're going to have a lot of duplicated tests here. That's a maintenance
burden when one of them needs fixes later. And when new tests are added,
we won't automatically get them tested under each format.
Can we move the battery of tests into a function that takes a few
parameters (prereq name, branch to look at, etc) and then call it for
both the gpg/gpgsm cases?
-Peff
