On Thursday 14 June 2018 11:13 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > It is technically correct to call --set-upstream "unsupported", but > the reason why we want to see it fail is not because it is > unsupported, but because we actively interfere with the usual > "unique prefix" logic parse-options API gives its users and make it > not to trigger the longer-and-unique --set-upstream-to logic. > That sounds right. >> diff --git a/t/t3200-branch.sh b/t/t3200-branch.sh >> index 6c0b7ea4a..d14de82ba 100755 >> --- a/t/t3200-branch.sh >> +++ b/t/t3200-branch.sh >> @@ -884,7 +884,7 @@ test_expect_success 'test --unset-upstream on a particular branch' ' >> test_must_fail git config branch.my14.merge >> ' >> >> -test_expect_success '--set-upstream fails' ' >> +test_expect_success 'unsupported option --set-upstream fails' ' > > In other words, I am wondering if s/unsupported/disabled/ makes it > even more clear what is going on here. > I guess it would :-) Thanks for the better wording. I actually thought of asking for a better wording for the test message while sending the patch but somehow forgot to mention it. It seems I've got better wordings, regardless. I'll send a v2 with the correction. I'm still open to an alternative test description in case that make things even more clearer :-) Thanks, Sivaraam QUOTE: “The three principal virtues of a programmer are Laziness, Impatience, and Hubris.” - Camel book Sivaraam? You possibly might have noticed that my signature recently changed from 'Kaartic' to 'Sivaraam' both of which are parts of my name. I find the new signature to be better for several reasons one of which is that the former signature has a lot of ambiguities in the place I live as it is a common name (NOTE: it's not a common spelling, just a common name). So, I switched signatures before it's too late. That said, I won't mind you calling me 'Kaartic' if you like it [of course ;-)]. You can always call me using either of the names. KIND NOTE TO THE NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER: As I'm not a native English speaker myself, there might be mistaeks in my usage of English. I apologise for any mistakes that I make. It would be "helpful" if you take the time to point out the mistakes. It would be "super helpful" if you could provide suggestions about how to correct those mistakes. Thanks in advance!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
