Re: [PATCH 4/3] ewah: adjust callers of ewah_read_mmap()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 6/14/2018 11:44 PM, Jeff King wrote:
>> The return value of ewah_read_mmap() is now an ssize_t,
>> since we could (in theory) process up to 32GB of data. This
>> would never happen in practice, but a corrupt or malicious
>> .bitmap or index file could convince us to do so.
>
> Aside: Why a 32GB limit? Usually I see 32-bit issues limiting by 2
> (signed) or 4 GB (unsigned). Is there something specifically in the
> bitmap format that stops at this size?

The proposed log message for 1/3 has this bit

  - check the size for integer overflow (this should be
    impossible on 64-bit, as the size is given as a 32-bit
    count of 8-byte words, but is possible on a 32-bit
    system)

4 Giga 8-byte words makes 32 Giga bytes, I'd guess.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux