Hi, On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Sat, 9 Jun 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > The annotations are tracked in a new ref, refs/annotations/commits, > > in the same fan-out style as .git/objects/??/*, only that they only > > exist in the object database now. > > Isn't this abusing the refs namespace a bit? Why not > .git/annotations/... instead? In the way I planned it, it is not at all abusing the refs namespace. These annotations _are_ tracked in a proper branch. Only that the "file names" in the tree objects actually refer to commit names. Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html