On 6/11/07, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Alex Riesen" <raa.lkml@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> It is still a reference, really. Besides, if it is not under refs/, we'd
> have to change fetch/push to allow distribution of the notes/annotations
> (there are special assumptions regarding reference names starting
> with "refs/"). Right now it just works.
Two issues.
One is that it is unclear is how the reachability rules should
be. Should an ??/?{38} entry in the refs/annotations/commits
protects the commit the entry talks about (i.e. ???{38}) from
getting pruned?
I think it should be the other way around: annotations get loose
and reported as such (and maybe even removed) by git-fsck.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
