Re: [PATCH 0/2] Test improvements for 'sg/complete-paths'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Junio,

On Mon, 21 May 2018, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> On Fri, 18 May 2018, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
> 
> > > > So, I think for v2 I will rewrite these tests to call
> > > > __git_complete_index_file() directly instead of using
> > > > 'test_completion', and will include a test with spaces in path
> > > > names.
> > > 
> > > Quite well thought-out reasoning.  Thanks.
> > 
> > Unfortunately I couldn't get around to it soon enough, and now the topic
> > 'sg/complete-paths' is already in next, so here are those test
> > improvements on top.
> 
> I can verify that the weeks-long breakage of `pu` on Windows has been
> addressed, probably by this patch series.

Please note that as the branch that is fixed by these two patches was
already merged down to `next`, the Continuous Testing on Windows reports
that `next` is broken.

(I saw that breakage for over a week, but was too busy elsewhere to act on
it.)

It would be really lovely to see it fixed soon, so that other bugs cannot
be hidden by that breakage.

And I would also love to see sg/complete-paths to be merged down to
`master` *only* in conjunction with these two patches, not on its own
(because that would break the Continuous Testing on Windows of `master`,
which is something I really want us to avoid).

Thanks,
Dscho

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux