Hi, On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Johan Herland wrote: > On Sunday 10 June 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Johan Herland wrote: > > > Small typo here. "core.showannotaions" should be "core.showannotations", > > > I guess. > > > > Yep. I tested it with "core.shownotes", but decided before sending the > > patch that the name would be inconsistent with the rest of the code. > > > > However, as I suggested later, I could imagine that an even better way > > could be to have "core.annotationsRef", overrideable by > > GIT_ANNOTATIONS_REF, which could possibly even be a list of refs. > > > > BTW I am not married to calling it "annotations". If you like "notes" > > better, I'm fine with it. > > No problem. Actually I really wanted to call my first > proof-of-concept "annotations", and not "notes", but I > figured it would be confused with the "annotate-as-in-blame" > concept. Besides there is already a git-annotate command... Not to forget that note is shorter to type. Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
