On Sunday 10 June 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Johan Herland wrote: > > Small typo here. "core.showannotaions" should be "core.showannotations", > > I guess. > > Yep. I tested it with "core.shownotes", but decided before sending the > patch that the name would be inconsistent with the rest of the code. > > However, as I suggested later, I could imagine that an even better way > could be to have "core.annotationsRef", overrideable by > GIT_ANNOTATIONS_REF, which could possibly even be a list of refs. > > BTW I am not married to calling it "annotations". If you like "notes" > better, I'm fine with it. No problem. Actually I really wanted to call my first proof-of-concept "annotations", and not "notes", but I figured it would be confused with the "annotate-as-in-blame" concept. Besides there is already a git-annotate command... ...Johan -- Johan Herland, <johan@xxxxxxxxxxx> www.herland.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
