Re: [PATCH 12/21] Use prefixcmp() instead of memcmp() for cleaner code with less magic numbers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday 09 June 2007, Alex Riesen wrote:
> On 6/9/07, Johan Herland <johan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * Perform parsing and verification of tag object data.
> > + *
> > + * The 'item' parameter may be set to NULL if only verification is desired.
> > + *
> > + * The given data _must_ be null-terminated.
> > + */
> >  int parse_and_verify_tag_buffer(struct tag *item,
> >                 const char *data, const unsigned long size, int thorough_verify)
> 
> This hunk really belongs into commit which introduced the function
> parse_and_verify_tag_buffer.

Yes. I'm sorry it slipped out of that patch and into this one.


...Johan


-- 
Johan Herland, <johan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
www.herland.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux