On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 10:24:48 -0700
Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> +static void connect_wt_gitdir_in_nested(const char *sub_worktree,
> + const char *sub_gitdir)
> +{
> + int i;
> + struct repository subrepo;
> + struct strbuf sub_wt = STRBUF_INIT;
> + struct strbuf sub_gd = STRBUF_INIT;
> +
> + const struct submodule *sub;
> +
> + if (repo_init(&subrepo, sub_gitdir, sub_worktree))
> + return;
If repo_init() fails, is it because the working tree doesn't exist on
disk, so we don't need to perform any connections on submodules? I think
a comment should be added to describe this.
> +
> + if (repo_read_index(&subrepo) < 0)
> + die("index file corrupt in repo %s", subrepo.gitdir);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < subrepo.index->cache_nr; i++) {
> + const struct cache_entry *ce = subrepo.index->cache[i];
> +
> + if (!S_ISGITLINK(ce->ce_mode))
> + continue;
> +
> + while (i + 1 < subrepo.index->cache_nr &&
> + !strcmp(ce->name, subrepo.index->cache[i + 1]->name))
> + /*
> + * Skip entries with the same name in different stages
> + * to make sure an entry is returned only once.
> + */
> + i++;
> +
> + sub = submodule_from_path(&subrepo, &null_oid, ce->name);
> + if (!sub)
> + /* submodule not checked out? */
> + continue;
> +
> + if (is_submodule_active(&subrepo, ce->name)) {
Optional: This could be combined with the previous "if" block, so that
the following lines don't need to be indented.
> + strbuf_addf(&sub_wt, "%s/%s", sub_worktree, sub->path);
> + strbuf_addf(&sub_gd, "%s/modules/%s", sub_gitdir, sub->name);
> +
> + connect_work_tree_and_git_dir(sub_wt.buf, sub_gd.buf, 0);
> + connect_wt_gitdir_in_nested(sub_wt.buf, sub_gd.buf);
What's the difference between having this call to
connect_wt_gitdir_in_nested() and just passing 1 instead of 0 to
connect_work_tree_and_git_dir()? I see that the latter uses absolute
paths, but that would seem to have the same effect. (If not, I think a
comment is warranted.)
> +
> + strbuf_reset(&sub_wt);
> + strbuf_reset(&sub_gd);
I think we normally write the resets before the strbuf_addf(), so that
it's clearer that sub_wt and sub_gd are meant to start from scratch in
every iteration.
Overall, this version of the patch is clearer - thanks.
