On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:17:04PM -0400, Dakota Hawkins wrote: > Sorry to tack on to my previous email, but I just thought of this: > > If something like "-diff=lfs" won't do what I (and git-lfs) thought it > would, do you think it would be prudent/reasonable to suggest git-lfs > add a "no-lfs" filter for exactly this case? That way I could have > explicit exclusions without any "diff=foo" shenanigans. It might be if my earlier email weren't totally wrong. ;) I think the "!filter" syntax that Junio mentioned would do what you want. -Peff
